中兴 Blade A510 智能手机简短评测
中兴 Blade A510 智能手机简短评测低价位高品质拍照手机？ 中国生产商中兴的最新入门级智能手机Blade A510主攻高性价比市场，适合需要高品质拍照／录像的用户。它的1300万前置相机究竟效果如何，作为低价位设备它的整体表现又如何，请阅读我们的评测了解更多。Marcus Herbrich, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 03/26/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇷🇺 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 Touchscreen Android Smartphone
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
ZTE Blade A510 (Blade Series)ProcessorMediatek MT6735P 4 x 1 GHz, Cortex-A53Graphics adapterARM Mali-T720Memory1024 MB Display5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式，多点触控, LCD, IPS, glossy: yesStorage8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB , 3 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 卡 (最高 32GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器，近距感应器，环境光感应器，霍尔感应器, WiFi Direct, LED状态灯Networking802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G 850/900/1800/1900 3G 900/2100 4G B1/B3/7/8/20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 143 x 70Battery2200 mAh Lithium-Ion, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 25 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 12 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 395 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 620 hOperating SystemAndroid 6.0 MarshmallowCameraPrimary Camera: 13 MPix 相变自动对焦，拍摄模式：曝光度／场景模式／色彩效果，连拍／面部识别／防抖，拍摄尺寸设定／白平衡Secondary Camera: 5 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 单通道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, 手机（包括电池），立体声耳机，电源适配器，USB数据线，快速开始说明, ZTE UI, 24 Months Warranty, 头部电磁辐射值：0.416 W/Kg, fanlessWeight130 g, Power Supply: 38 g
Price129 EuroLinksZTE homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Blackview A8 Max Archos 50 Platinum 4G TP-Link Neffos C5 Huawei Y5 II Ulefone Metal ZTE Blade V7 Lite ZTE Blade A510 DIN A6 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Google Pixel XL 2016Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +808%ZTE Blade A510Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s Blackview A8 MaxMali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 MBit/s -1% iperf3 receive AX12Google Pixel XL 2016Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +957%ZTE Blade A510Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s Blackview A8 MaxMali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
34.3 MBit/s -30% iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 mUlefone MetalMali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s Huawei Y5 IIMali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.9 MBit/s TP-Link Neffos C5Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s Archos 50 Platinum 4GMali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.5 MBit/s iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 mUlefone MetalMali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s Archos 50 Platinum 4GMali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s Huawei Y5 IIMali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.3 MBit/s TP-Link Neffos C5Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s
GPS ZTE Blade A510
GPS ZTE Blade A510
GPS ZTE Blade A510
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesZTE Blade A510HP Elite X3Huawei P9Cannon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesZTE Blade A510HP Elite X3Huawei P9Cannon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesZTE Blade A510HP Elite X3Huawei P9Cannon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
523cd/m²538cd/m²534cd/m²516cd/m²528cd/m²521cd/m²517cd/m²505cd/m²537cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessLCD tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 538 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 524.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.85 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 528 cd/m²Contrast: 852:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}Gamma: 1.99CCT: 6631 K
ZTE Blade A510IPS, 1280x720, 5"ZTE Blade V7 LiteIPS, 1280x720, 5"TP-Link Neffos C5IPS, 1280x720, 5"Ulefone MetalIPS, 1280x720, 5"Archos 50 Platinum 4GIPS, 1280x720, 5"Blackview A8 MaxIPS, 1280x720, 5.5"Huawei Y5 IIIPS, 1280x720, 5"Google Pixel XL 2016AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"Screen-11%-14%-29%-19%-29%-35%-1%Brightness middle528312 -41%508 -4%312 -41%344 -35%435 -18%465 -12%402 -24%Brightness524302 -42%491 -6%315 -40%349 -33%407 -22%443 -15%408 -22%Brightness Distribution9479 -16%89 -5%87 -7%89 -5%86 -9%90 -4%85 -10%Black Level *0.620.15 76%0.58 6%0.56 10%0.65 -5%1.08 -74%0.84 -35%Contrast8522080 144%876 3%557 -35%529 -38%403 -53%554 -35%Colorchecker dE 2000 *5.28.2 -58%7 -35%6.8 -31%5.8 -12%5.7 -10%7.8 -50%4 23%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *8.716.5 -90%14.1 -62%14 -61%10.7 -23%12.3 -41%15.7 -80%10.1 -16%Greyscale dE 2000 *5.79.2 -61%6.1 -7%7.1 -25%5.7 -0%5.9 -4%8.4 -47%3.2 44%Gamma1.99 111%2.29 96%2.15 102%2.77 79%2.1 105%2.18 101%2.07 106%2.19 100%CCT6631 98%9017 72%8068 81%7402 88%7792 83%8164 80%8438 77%7037 92%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise↘ 30 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey636 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 476 ms rise↘ 160 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
AndroBench 3-5 | AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 4.0 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
16.5 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s -24%TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s +14%Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s +67%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
15.58 MB/s -6%Blackview A8 Max
18.5 MB/s +12%Huawei Y5 II
18.03 MB/s +9% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
25.55 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s -11%TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s +53%Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s +94%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
31.85 MB/s +25%Blackview A8 Max
35.94 MB/s +41%Huawei Y5 II
29.47 MB/s +15% Random Write 4KB (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
4.69 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s +76%TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s +46%Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s +68%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.35 MB/s -7%Blackview A8 Max
5.65 MB/s +20%Huawei Y5 II
6 MB/s +28%Google Pixel XL 2016
14.56 MB/s +210% Random Read 4KB (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
14.03 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s +30%TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s +22%Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s +58%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
14.31 MB/s +2%Blackview A8 Max
16.15 MB/s +15%Huawei Y5 II
27.3 MB/s +95%Google Pixel XL 2016
87.7 MB/s +525% Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
9.94 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.3 MB/s +607%TP-Link Neffos C5
52.4 MB/s +427%Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s +302%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
7.56 MB/s -24%Blackview A8 Max
47.25 MB/s +375%Huawei Y5 II
21.6 MB/s +117%Google Pixel XL 2016
83.4 MB/s +739% Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
111.9 MB/s ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.3 MB/s +67%TP-Link Neffos C5
145.8 MB/s +30%Ulefone Metal
228.8 MB/s +104%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
125.4 MB/s +12%Blackview A8 Max
141.8 MB/s +27%Huawei Y5 II
173.3 MB/s +55%Google Pixel XL 2016
258.2 MB/s +131%AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points -2%TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points +34%Ulefone Metal
37103 Points +52%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points -3%Blackview A8 Max
30916 Points +27%Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points -2%Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points +470%Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
429 Points Ulefone Metal
609 Points +42%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
428 Points 0%Blackview A8 Max
589 Points +37%Huawei Y5 II
561 Points +31%Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points +253% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
1195 Points Ulefone Metal
2458 Points +106%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1206 Points +1%Blackview A8 Max
1525 Points +28%Huawei Y5 II
1573 Points +32%Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points +249%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points -1%TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points +58%Ulefone Metal
7059 Points +127%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points 0%Blackview A8 Max
3809 Points +23%Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points +793%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points -1%TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points +57%Ulefone Metal
6469 Points +141%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points 0%Blackview A8 Max
3284 Points +22%Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points +1117%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points 0%TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points +32%Ulefone Metal
10371 Points +48%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points -2%Blackview A8 Max
8646 Points +23%Huawei Y5 II
Points -100%Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points +159%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points Ulefone Metal
293 Points Blackview A8 Max
158 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points Ulefone Metal
243 Points Blackview A8 Max
129 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points Ulefone Metal
1057 Points Blackview A8 Max
727 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
125 Points Ulefone Metal
195 Points Blackview A8 Max
102 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
101 Points Ulefone Metal
158 Points Blackview A8 Max
82 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
796 Points Ulefone Metal
1084 Points Blackview A8 Max
728 Points Huawei Y5 II
Points Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps -4%TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps -2%Ulefone Metal
12 fps +41%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps -42%Blackview A8 Max
10 fps +18%Huawei Y5 II
15 fps +76%Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps +547%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps 0%TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps +186%Ulefone Metal
19 fps +288%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps +78%Blackview A8 Max
6 fps +22%Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps +71%Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps +1757%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps -49%TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps -20%Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps +83%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -66%Blackview A8 Max
4.5 fps +29%Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps +74%Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps +757%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps Blackview A8 Max
2.2 fps Huawei Y5 II
fps Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps -52%Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps +80%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps -52%Blackview A8 Max
3.2 fps +28%Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps +580%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps +127%Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps +709%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps +145%Blackview A8 Max
1.4 fps +27%Huawei Y5 II
fps -100%Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps +2809%PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points +29%Ulefone Metal
4079 Points +52%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points +5%Blackview A8 Max
3427 Points +28%Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points +21%Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points +77%BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points +218%TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points +384%Ulefone Metal
273 Points +94%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points +5%Blackview A8 Max
201 Points +43%Huawei Y5 II
183 Points +30%Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points +1587% System (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points -3%TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points +45%Ulefone Metal
1691 Points +104%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points +1%Blackview A8 Max
1125 Points +36%Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points +32%Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points +369% Memory (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points +71%TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points +248%Ulefone Metal
802 Points +181%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points +24%Blackview A8 Max
733 Points +157%Huawei Y5 II
375 Points +32%Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points +488% Graphics (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points 0%TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points +61%Ulefone Metal
433 Points +149%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points +1%Blackview A8 Max
211 Points +21%Huawei Y5 II
283 Points +63%Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points +2783% Web (sort by value)ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points +5820%TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points +6280%Ulefone Metal
10 Points 0%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points -10%Blackview A8 Max
9 Points -10%Huawei Y5 II
10 Points 0%Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points +9670%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510
17364 ms * ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234 ms * -11%TP-Link Neffos C5
12783 ms * +26%Ulefone Metal
13397 ms * +23%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
19092 ms * -10%Blackview A8 Max
13643 ms * +21%Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * +28%Google Pixel XL 2016
2654 ms * +85%Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points -9%TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points +30%Ulefone Metal
2738 Points +30%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2122 Points +1%Blackview A8 Max
2607 Points +24%Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points +29%Google Pixel XL 2016
8690 Points +313%JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade A510
12.78 Points ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.73 Points 0%TP-Link Neffos C5
18.21 Points +42%Ulefone Metal
17.83 Points +40%Archos 50 Platinum 4G
12.76 Points 0%Blackview A8 Max
17.19 Points +35%Huawei Y5 II
18.47 Points +45%Google Pixel XL 2016
55.4 Points +333%Legend
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash* ... smaller is better
Max. LoadIdle
35.3 °C36 °C35 °C 35.6 °C35.3 °C37.4 °C 34.7 °C35 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 37.4 °CAverage: 35.5 °C
33.3 °C33.3 °C35.5 °C33.3 °C33.1 °C36.1 °C32.7 °C33.4 °C35.3 °C
Maximum: 36.1 °CAverage: 34 °C Power Supply (max.) 31.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
31 °C32 °C34.7 °C 32 °C32.1 °C36.1 °C 31.5 °C31.6 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 36.1 °CAverage: 32.5 °C
30 °C30.4 °C31.8 °C30.3 °C30.7 °C31.8 °C30.4 °C30.7 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 31.8 °CAverage: 30.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 13% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.05 / 0.11 WattIdle 0.61 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt
Load
4.49 / 5.14 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
ZTE Blade A5102200 mAhZTE Blade V7 Lite2500 mAhTP-Link Neffos C52200 mAhUlefone Metal3050 mAhArchos 50 Platinum 4G2200 mAhBlackview A8 Max3000 mAhHuawei Y5 II2200 mAhPower Consumption20%-18%-56%6%-11%13%Idle Minimum *0.610.63 -3%0.72 -18%1.41 -131%0.59 3%0.74 -21%0.54 11%Idle Average *1.751.37 22%1.87 -7%2.46 -41%1.68 4%1.97 -13%1.58 10%Idle Maximum *1.831.71 7%2 -9%2.83 -55%1.79 2%2.09 -14%1.7 7%Load Average *4.492.82 37%5.99 -33%5.15 -15%4.22 6%4.89 -9%2.98 34%Load Maximum *5.143.36 35%6.45 -25%7.05 -37%4.26 17%5.09 1%4.98 3%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 56min
ZTE Blade A5102200 mAhZTE Blade V7 Lite2500 mAhTP-Link Neffos C52200 mAhUlefone Metal3050 mAhArchos 50 Platinum 4G2200 mAhBlackview A8 Max3000 mAhHuawei Y5 II2200 mAhBattery RuntimeWiFi v1.3416517 24%453 9%403 -3%384 -8%506 22%503 21%
Pros+ IPS屏幕面板
+ 屏幕最高亮度
+ 相对低的色彩偏差
+ 零售价
+ 低发热量
+ 非常优秀的通话音质Cons- 性能
- 1GB工作内存
- 迟缓的8GB闪存
- 扬声器
In review: ZTE Blade A510. Review sample courtesy of notebookbilliger.de.来自中国生产商中兴的Blade A510毋庸置疑是一台性价比十分优秀的入门级智能手机。它的IPS屏幕明亮且均匀，在这个价位上对比度也十分优秀。在我们的测试中它的色彩还原能力也可以让人满意。另外，中兴的这台设备通话音质优秀，相机模组表现也在同价位设备中属于佼佼者。它的电池续航也可以令人满意。
十分不错的Blade A510唯一的弱点是性能上的不足，它可能会实现不错的销售额。
Blade A510的最大一个弱点是较低的系统性能，这也是我们不能完全向消费者推荐这台设备的原因所在。这块MediaTek芯片的低性能搭配1GB工作内存，和缓慢的eMMC闪存让它的系统运行时常缓慢不堪，加载应用的等待时间也相对过长。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
ZTE Blade A510
- 03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis82%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device84%
Connectivity37 / 60 → 62%
Weight94%
Battery89%
Display83%
Games Performance5 / 63 → 7%
Application Performance19 / 70 → 28%
Temperature90%
Noise100%
Audio59 / 91 → 65%
Camera60%
Average67%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceZTE Blade A510 (Blade Series)Review•中兴 Blade V8 智能手机简短评测 |Review•中兴 Blade S6 智能手机简短评测
Price comparison
Please share our article, every link counts!